Ethena’s USDe vs miUSD: The Stablecoin War for Bitcoin Liquidity

Ethena’s USDe vs miUSD: The Stablecoin War for Bitcoin Liquidity

How Omnichain Design and Delta-Neutral Strategies Are Competing for $30B in ETF Inflows


The Battlefield: Bitcoin’s $1.3T Liquidity Pool

With Bitcoin ETF inflows surpassing $30B in 2024, a new front has opened in the stablecoin wars:

  • Ethena’s USDe: Delta-neutral synthetic dollar backed by BTC collateral + perps (5.6% APY)
  • Mitosis’ miUSD: Omnichain stablecoin powered by cross-chain LP positions (8-12% APY)
💡 Why This Matters:
The winner will shape how Bitcoin’s idle liquidity enters DeFi—as isolated ETH-based instruments or chain-agnostic money lego.

Technical Breakdown: Two Visions of Stability

1. Ethena USDe: The Perpetual Engine

  • Mechanics:
    1. Deposit BTC → mint USDe
    2. Hedge delta via inverse perps (e.g., Binance BTCUSD)
    3. Earn funding rates + staking yield
// Simplified USDe Minting  
function mintUSDe(uint256 btcAmount) external {  
    BTC.transferFrom(msg.sender, vault, btcAmount);  
    USDe.mint(msg.sender, btcAmount * price);  
    openShortPerp(btcAmount); // Delta-neutral  
}  

Pros:

  • High yield from perps + staking
  • Native Bitcoin integration

Cons:

  • Centralized exchange risk (70% perps on Binance)
  • Limited to Ethereum

2. Mitosis miUSD: The Omnichain Workhorse

  • Mechanics:
    1. Deposit cross-chain assets (BTC, ETH, SOL) → mint miUSD
    2. Auto-deployed to highest-yield pools across 12+ chains
// Omnichain miUSD Minting  
function mintMiUSD(address collateral, uint256 amount) external {  
    IERC20(collateral).transferFrom(msg.sender, address(this), amount);  
    miUSD.mint(msg.sender, amount * price);  
    _rebalanceLiquidity(); // Distributes to optimal chains  
}  

Pros:

Cons:


Comparative Analysis

Metric USDe miUSD
Backing BTC + Perps Multi-chain LP
Yield Source Funding rates Liquidity mining
Chain Coverage 2 (ETH, Solana) 12+
APY (June 2024) 5.6% 8.2%–12.4%
Security Model CEX-dependent MPC + ZK Proofs

Use Cases: Where Each Shines

USDe’s Niche: Ethereum-Centric Strategies

  • Institutional Cash Management: BlackRock uses USDe for Treasury yields
  • Perp Traders: Hedge ETH exposure while earning yield

miUSD’s Playground: Omnichain Dominance

  1. Cross-Collateral Loans:
    • Borrow miUSD against Solana NFTs → repay on Arbitrum
  2. Multi-Chain Farming:
    • Deposit miUSD into 3 highest-yield pools via auto-rebalancer
  3. Stablecoin Arbitrage:
    • Exploit 0.5–1.2% spreads between chains

Risks & Mitigations

Risk USDe miUSD
Centralization Relies on Binance perps Decentralized MPC validators
Liquidation BTC volatility → margin calls Overcollateralized reserves
Regulatory SEC scrutiny (synthetic ETF) zk-KYC compartments

Conclusion: The Omnichain Endgame

While USDe offers compelling Bitcoin-native yields, miUSD’s chain-agnostic liquidity engine positions it as the stablecoin of choice for:
Multi-chain DeFi users needing universal liquidity
Institutions requiring compliant cross-chain rails
Long-term hodlers seeking compounding without chain loyalty