EVM vs SVM: comparison, what are the prospects

EVM vs SVM: comparison, what are the prospects

A virtual machine is the foundation of any blockchain. It determines performance, security, developer capabilities, and ecosystem compatibility. Today, the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) is the undisputed industry standard. But the Solana Virtual Machine (SVM) is rapidly gaining popularity due to its high performance and special architecture.

In this article, we will compare EVM and SVM, understand the key differences, and answer the main question: which one is ready for the future of Web3?

What is EVM and SVM?

EVM (Ethereum Virtual Machine) is a stack-based virtual machine that executes smart contract bytecode in Ethereum and compatible blockchains (Polygon, BNB Chain, Avalanche C-Chain, etc.). Programs are written in Solidity or Vyper.

SVM (Solana Virtual Machine) is a virtual machine that underlies Solana. Contracts in it are called programs and are written in Rust or C, executed with high parallelism and low latency.

EVM vs SVM — Technical Comparison

Feature

EVM (Ethereum Virtual Machine)

SVM (Solana Virtual Machine)

Main Language

Solidity / Vyper

Rust / C / C++

Execution Model

Sequential (single-threaded)

Parallel (multi-threaded via Sealevel)

Block Time

~12 seconds

~400 milliseconds

Transactions Per Second (TPS)

~15–30 (L1) / higher on L2s

10,000+

Storage Model

Simple key-value

Account-based with parallelization support

Developer Onboarding

Easy / Mature Tooling

Complex / Rust-heavy

Compatibility

High (widely adopted)

Limited to Solana or SVM-based chains

Security

Battle-tested

Still maturing, under rapid development

Technological features

🔹 EVM:

1.      Simplicity: clear model, extensive documentation.

2.      Limitations: single-threaded execution, strict gas limits, which complicates the development of complex applications.

3.      Ecosystem: hundreds of L2 and sidechains, integration with most tools.

🔹 SVM:

•         High speed: transactions are processed in parallel.

•         Complexity: requires a deep understanding of Rust and system programming.

•         Unique runtime: no compatibility with EVM, but Solana offers its own framework (Anchor) to simplify.

Developer Perspective — When to Choose EVM or SVM

Question or Requirement

EVM

SVM

Preferred Language Stack

Solidity, TypeScript

Rust, C

Need for high throughput

May require L2 solutions

Native high TPS

Launching standard DeFi or NFT apps

Easier due to templates and libraries

More flexibility, but more complexity

Custom execution logic

Limited within EVM constraints

Possible with low-level Rust and parallelism

Cross-chain and ecosystem compatibility

Broad and established

Growing but more limited

Learning curve

Lower

Higher

Why SVM is gaining popularity

High performance

Developers can build complex on-chain games, orders, AMM and other structures that are impossible on EVM without off-chain solutions.

Growing Solana Ecosystem

Solana has seen its share of technical hiccups, but since 2024, it has shown stability and increased activity.

Infrastructure and Standards

Frameworks like Anchor and Sealevel VM are making development more accessible.

SVM beyond Solana

Projects like Eclipse, Nitro, Solana L2 on Ethereum, and even rollup solutions are starting to adopt SVM beyond Solana.

Future Outlook — Short and Long Term

Virtual Machine

Short-Term Outlook

Long-Term Potential

EVM

Dominates today via Ethereum and L2s

Might face scalability limitations without major changes

SVM

Rapid ecosystem growth through Solana and L2 adoption

Could become a high-performance standard for Web3

EVM is not losing ground

Despite its limitations, EVM remains a leader due to:

•         a huge developer base,

•         mature infrastructure (Hardhat, Foundry, Remix, Chainlink),

•         cross-chain availability.

Current initiatives like zkEVM, parallel EVM, Move-to-EVM are also pushing EVM into the next generation.

Conclusion

EVM is a stable, mature, and versatile choice, especially for simple or quickly-launched dApps. It will remain a central part of the Web3 ecosystem for a long time to come.

SVM is a bet on performance, scalability, and new scenarios. It can become a key component of the Web3 2.0 infrastructure.

This is why many teams are starting to develop EVM-compatible applications, but with an eye on moving to SVM or multi-VM architectures.